François Cosserat entered the École Polytechnique in 1870 when his youngest brother Eugène, with whom he would later collaborate, was only four years old. The examination for entry to the École Polytechnique was highly competitive and François was ranked twenty-sixth among the successful candidates in that year. He graduated in 1872, ranked twentieth in the list of 141 students who graduated in that year. Along with seventeen other graduates from the École Polytechnique, Cosserat opted to continue his training at the École Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées. There he trained in engineering, specialising in civil engineering. After three years of study, he graduated in 1875 as a Civil Engineer Third Class. He was ranked ninth among those who graduated in that year and began working in the public sector involved in construction work.
In 1878, Cosserat married; the only child of the marriage was a daughter Amélie Adèle who married the marine engineer Édouard-Victor Davaux (1876-1950). Cosserat became a Railway Engineer Second Class (Northern Zone) in 1879. His work comprised building railway tracks, tunnels and bridges. In 1883 he was promoted to Civil Engineer First Class and, on 1 February of the following year, he moved to work for the Railway Company of the East, for whom he continued to work for the remainder of his career. In 1895 he was promoted to Chief Engineer Second Class.
The details we have given show that Cosserat had a highly successful career as a civil engineer. However, what is remarkable is that he was able to undertake top quality mathematical research while having a career which meant that he was totally isolated from other mathematicians and scientists. Of course, his brother Eugène Cosserat was an academic in Toulouse and François Cosserat published many outstanding joint works with his brother. It is tempting to believe, therefore, that Eugène Cosserat would be the major player in their joint research but this would be far from the truth. In fact during the period of their close collaboration, Eugène Cosserat was burdened by heavy administrative tasks and was only a very minor contributor. Pommaret writes in  that:-
... the main creative mechanical ideas (the most striking behind the computations) have been furnished by François, while Eugène, overburdened by management tasks at the Observatory of Toulouse, was just rectifying the computations. Indeed when one gets the basic definitions and provides the variational methods, the main problem is to give them a physical meaning. Also, Eugène was still in a good position for publishing the results announced in [earlier joint publications] after the death of his brother. However, nothing on mechanics was published after 1914! Meanwhile, it is painful to know that, when François asked for a position in mechanics at the École Polytechnique, in competition with Hadamard (supported by Painlevé) and Jouguet, somebody pointed out doubts on his participation in this work in collaboration, and finally ... Jouguet was elected!François Cosserat's contributions as a mathematician were noted, however, in the annual reports on his work as a civil engineer. For example, the report written on 27 June 1898 states, "M François Cosserat is a distinguished engineer who has high practical experience. In addition to his normal position, he devotes himself to theoretical studies and he recently presented to the Académie des Sciences remarkable works on mechanics." The report of 11 October 1910 states, "M François Cosserat is a valued collaborator, highly efficient, especially in public works. He is known among the scientific community as the author of remarkable studies on questions of mathematics and mechanics." The report of 20 October 1913 states, "M François Cosserat has high competence for building tunnels, bridges, ... and he is also a distinguished mathematician, President of the French Mathematical Society. He contributed this very year to the quick completion of many military works."
From this last quote we see that François Cosserat was President of the Société Mathématique de France. In fact he was elected Vice-President of the Society in 1912 and then became President in the following year. These, however, were not the only honours bestowed on him. He was made a Knight of the Légion d'Honneur in 1893, and was elected to the Académie des Sciences in 1896. It is now time to consider his mathematical contributions.
Cosserat began his mathematical studies considering a theory of elasticity but went on to consider broad questions concerning mechanics particularly relating to gravitational, electrical and thermal phenomena. This work was carried out in collaboration with his brother, Eugène Cosserat, who was, at the time the collaboration began, professor of differential and integral calculus at the University of Toulouse. This collaboration between the two Cosserat brothers began in 1896 with the publication Théorie de l'élasticité Ⓣ. This first work studied broad questions relating to the foundations of mechanics but later their work turned towards the physical theory. By the early 1900s both Cosserat brothers were devoting all their research efforts towards working on mechanics. Their most important joint publications are: Note sur la cinématique d'un milieu continu Ⓣ (1897); Note sur la dynamique du point et du corps invariable Ⓣ (1906); Note sur la théorie de l'action euclidienne Ⓣ (1909); and the book Théorie des corps déformables Ⓣ (1909). The first of these was published as an addition to Gabriel Koenigs' Leçons de Cinématique professées à la Sorbonne : cinématique théorique Ⓣ. A review of this work by E O Lovett in the Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society in 1900 singles out the Cosserats' contribution:-
The introduction of this note is peculiarly fortunate for it is high time that kinematics should comprehend the study of deformation and of deformable spaces. The authors have included in their extract certain generalities on curvilinear coordinates, the deformation of a continuous medium in general, infinitely small deformation, use of the mobile trieder, and the case where the non-deformed medium is referred to any curvilinear coordinates.This innovative work on mechanics (21 joint publications on this topic are listed in ) ended with the François Cosserat's death in 1914, after which time his brother Eugène Cosserat published nothing further on the topic. Jacques Levy describes the two Cosserats' contributions to this area :-
The most practical results concerning elasticity were the introduction of the systematic use of the movable trihedral and the proposal and resolution, before Fredholm's studies, of the functional equations of the sphere and ellipsoid. The Cosserats theoretical research, designed to include everything in theoretical physics that is directly subject to the laws of mechanics, was founded on the notion of Euclidean action [least action] combined with Lagrange's ideas on the principle of extremality and Lie's ideas on invariance in regard to displacement groups. The bearing of this original and coherent conception was diminished in importance because at the time it was proposed, fundamental ideas were already being called into question by both the theory of relativity and progress in physical theory.The authors of  write:-
The Cosserat brothers, following a suggestion by Duhem (1893), developed a theory for continuous oriented bodies that consist not just of particles (or material points), but also of directions associated with each particle. Thus, in addition to the field of position vectors of a continuum in a given configuration, one also admits vector fields ... which may be chosen so as to represent pertinent features of materials. ... The Cosserats themselves recognised the value of oriented two-dimensional continua (i.e., curves and surfaces endowed with additional structure in the form of directors) for representing the deformations of rods and shells respectively. ... [However their] ideas on the subject [were] ignored for half a century.Pommaret, in , looks at the reception of the Cosserats' contributions:-
... among their contemporaries, only Henri Poincaré (electron theory), Émile Picard (surprisingly) and Élie Cartan appreciated the work done by the brothers. Exceptions are also colleagues of Eugène Cosserat in Toulouse, like L Ray and A Buhl. (Indeed the work of Buhl is a patching of mathematical analogies, far from physics.) It is only in Germany that the brothers got disciples like Karl Heun who quoted them with emphasis in the German edition of the 'Encyclopédie des Sciences Mathématique' and studied their work in a seminar at Karlsruhe in 1909. Then ... Relativity Theory and Quantum Physics overtook this period in science and the work of E and F Cosserat was almost rediscovered after 1950 because of the use of liquid crystals.In addition to his mathematical research, François Cosserat made other contributions to mathematics through his expertise in languages. He spoke Russian, as did his son-in-law Édouard-Victor Davaux, and both contributed translations of Russian mathematical works into French. François Cosserat also began translating Elementary Principles in Statistical Mechanics (1902) by J Willard Gibbs from English to French but died before completing the task. The translation was completed after his death but the French version of this classic did not appear until 1932. The Cosserat brothers François and Eugène also collaborated in translating the article on mechanics from the German Encyklopädie der mathematischen Wissenschaften Ⓣ for a French version of this monumental classic work. However, they did not just make a translation, they added a very large amount of new material of their own showing their great appreciation of the history and philosophy of the subject.
After François Cosserat died, Ernest Vessiot succeeded him as President of the Société Mathématique de France. Vessiot spoke about the collaboration between the two Cosserat brothers (see ):-
It would be indiscreet and foolhardy to identify in this collaboration, whose mystery is touching, what is due to one or the other of the two brothers; to find which particular one or other gives the qualities which distinguish these works: the geometric ingenuity and elegance, the analytical ability, the depth of the guiding ideas, and their power of adaptation to mechanical and physical applications. Let us just see how fruitful it was, and to greet respectfully at a time when death brought it to an end, before it had borne all the fruits that could be expected.It is now clear that the qualities that Vessiot saw so clearly in their joint work were almost all due to François Cosserat.
Article by: J J O'Connor and E F Robertson